"We strongly believe player behavior has improved and remain committed to enhancing player safety with these critical rules," Gervais said. Since the 2010-11 season, the penalty for contact to the head and hitting from behind into the sideboards or goal cage has been a minimum of a major penalty coupled with either a game misconduct or disqualification, depending on the severity of the foul. The committee met with the various ice hockey championship committees to discuss the overtime format before finalizing its approach.Ī significant amount of discussion centered around the penalty structure for hitting from behind and contact to the head. The host school's conference policy on shootouts will be followed. The committee voted to allow a shootout in situations where the game remains tied after the overtime period. The group decided to continue with this policy for all regular-season contests. The committee reviewed data and comments regarding the overtime format, which was altered two seasons ago to include a mandatory five-minute period with three skaters on each side. Referees continue to have discretion to review most aspects of the scoring of a goal and players where a major penalty is being considered. Several reviewable plays will require a coaches' challenge for review, including goaltender contact, offsides infractions and high sticking the puck that leads to a goal. "All areas of the hockey community indicated support for reducing the number of replay reviews." "The committee believes this change will reduce the number of reviews while still providing tools to ensure the most significant calls are made accurately," said Joe Gervais, committee chair and associate athletics director at Vermont. All rule proposals must be approved by the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel, which will discuss ice hockey recommendations July 20.Ĭommittee members believe the current process has created significant issues with game flow and puts unnecessary pressure on officials to review plays without a formal challenge being made. If approved, the rule would go into effect for the 2022-23 academic year. Any subsequent unsuccessful challenges would result in a minor penalty for delay of game. In the new process, coaches may challenge a reviewable play, and if the play is not reversed, a timeout will be charged for the unsuccessful challenge. The NCAA Men's and Women's Ice Hockey Rules Committee proposed a significant overhaul to the video replay process at its meeting this week in Indianapolis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |